Nationalekonomiska institutionen
Department of Economics

School of Economics and Management, Lund University

Ola Andersson

 

Home

Research

Teaching

CV

Links

 

Publications

"Do Antitrust Laws Facilitate Collusion? Experimental Evidence on Costly Communication in Duopolies"
(Co-author: Erik Wengström) The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2007, Vol 109, No 2, pp 321-339

Abstract: Bertrand supergames with non-binding communication are used to study price formation and stability of collusive agreements on experimental duopoly markets. The experimental design consists of three treatments with different costs of communication: zero-cost, low-cost and high-cost. Prices are found to be significantly higher when communication is costly. Moreover, costly communication decreases the number of messages, but more importantly, it enhances the stability of collusive agreements. McCutcheon (1997) presents an interesting application to antitrust policy by letting the cost of communication symbolize the presence of an antitrust law that prohibits firms from discussing prices. Although the experimental results do not support the mechanism of McCutcheon's (1997) argument, the findings point in the direction of her prediction that antitrust laws might work in the interest of firms.

"A Note on Renegotiation in Repeated Bertrand Duopolies"
(Co-author: Erik Wengström) Economics Letters 2007, Vol 95, No 3, pp 398-401

Abstract: Weak Renegotiation-Proofness (WRP) singles out marginal cost pricing as a unique pure-strategy equilibrium of the infinitely repeated Bertrand duopoly. We show that, with a discrete strategy space, WRP does not eliminate any relevant subgame perfect equilibrium outcome.

"On the Role of Patience in Collusive Bertrand Duopolies"
forthcoming in Economics Letters

Abstract: This paper analyzes the role of patience in a repeated Bertrand duopoly where firms bargain over which collusive price and market share to implement. It is shown that the least patient firm's market share is not monotone in its own discount factor.

Working Papers

"Endogenous Communication and Tacit Coordination in Market Entry Games - an explorative experimental study"
(Co-authors: Hans Carlsson and Håkan Holm) Department of Economics Working Paper Series 2006:12.

Abstract: Coordination problems can be solved tacitly or explicitly by communication. In the latter (but not in the former case) evidence of incriminating intentions of coordination might be detected by a third party who can use it in a trial. This paper investigates experimentally if and to what extent entry cost asymmetries may serve as tacit coordination devices in market entry games. This is done with and without the possibility of costly communication.

"Bargaining in Collusive Markets"
Department of Economics Working Paper Series 2006:21.

Abstract: In this paper we investigate collusion in an infinitely repeated Bertrand duopoly where firms have different discount factors. In order to study how a collusive agreement is reached we model the equilibrium selection as an alternating-offer bargaining game. The selected equilibrium has several appealing features: First, it is efficient in the sense that it entails immediate agreement on the monopoly price. Second, the equilibrium shows how discount factors affect equilibrium market shares. A comparative statics analysis on equilibrium market shares reveals that changes in discount factors may have ambiguous effects on market shares.

"Communication and Renegotitation in Two-stage Games"
(Co-author: Erik Wengström) Department of Economics Working Paper Series 2007:4.

Abstract: In this paper we experimentally investigate cooperation and non-binding communication in a two-stage game. The game has a subgame perfect equilibrium where subjects can sustain cooperation in the first stage by threatening to punish deviant behavior in the second stage. In contrast, renegotiation-proofness rules out cooperation in the first stage when intra-play communication is possible. Our results provide some support for this argument. We observe less cooperation in the first stage when intra-play communication is possible. Moreover, pre-play communication only has a significant impact on actions when intra-play communication is not allowed. The experimental design also enables us to perform an in-depth analysis of communication.

Work in Progress

 

 

Department of Economics  School of Economics and Management   Lund University